Trump Faces Stranding Choices as Iran‑Oman Strait Agreement Negotiated Amid War’s Sixth Month, Dilemma Deepens.
In the sixth month of the U.S.‑Iran war, President Donald Trump contends with an emerging Iran‑Oman agreement that could hand control of the Strait of Hormuz to Tehran. With limited alternatives, the administration’s next moves could solidify a military stalemate or force a diplomatic concession ahead of the November midterms.
By AVI News News Desk3 min read
🔍 Click to enlarge
Trump Faces Stranding Choices as Iran‑Oman Strait Agreement Negotiated Amid War’s Sixth Month, Dilemma Deepens.
Image via UnsplashThe U.S. war with Iran is now in its sixth month, and President Trump must choose between an interim deal negotiated by Iran and Oman that would give Tehran control of the Strait of Hormuz, or a new wave of airstrikes that risk deeper conflict.
If it is the first option, Iran would receive its biggest concession since the February 28 attacks, formalising the country’s supervision of the strait—a region the Trump administration had vowed to keep open and not controlled by Iran.
A second path would be fresh U.S. airstrikes, which, according to analysts, could bring political danger for Trump ahead of the November midterm elections and give no better chance of success than earlier bombing campaigns that failed to bring Iran to its knees.
Trump could also keep the uneasy status quo, maintaining a blockade of Iranian ports and retaliating when shipping is attacked, but that approach offers no face‑saving exit for a president who said the war would end by mid‑April.
“It’s a menu of bad options but Trump may have come to the realisation that he can’t let this war go on endlessly,” said former Middle East negotiator Aaron David Miller.
A U.S. official told Reuters that any temporary shipping routes would be “without any impediments,” with no party overseeing transit.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio has insisted the strait must remain an open international waterway free of tolls or fees, a stance Trump has previously contradicted.
With higher gasoline prices, low approval ratings and a war that is deeply unpopular, the president’s room to manoeuvre is shrinking, observers said.
Reopening the strait is seen as a prerequisite for resuming negotiations focused on Iran’s nuclear programme, which the Trump administration wants to tackle next.
Proposed terms would grant Iran some control over ships entering the Gulf through the strait, a senior Iranian source and two regional officials told Reuters. Trump said the deal reopening the waterway is imminent, but Iranian officials said details remain to be resolved.
Even if an Iran‑Oman pact is sealed and U.S.–Iran talks resume, experts doubt a final peace based on the June memorandum that quickly unraveled and that had initially given Iran some sanctions relief, criticism that drew fire from Republicans.
White House officials have said the conflict could still be ongoing in some form by the midterms, a U.S. official told Reuters. The president said he canceled plans for new large‑scale attacks after Middle Eastern partners urged him to try diplomacy again, while threatening to hit hard if that effort failed.
Iran warned Gulf allies that any new U.S. strikes would trigger retaliation against their energy infrastructure, five sources with knowledge of the discussions said.
Jonathan Panikoff noted that China, Russia, and North Korea are watching closely. Some hawks advise caution, with Behnam Ben Taleblu writing, "The Islamic Republic is trying to force President Trump into a lose‑lose proposition before November."
The situation places the Trump administration at a crossroads: a diplomatic surrender and Iranian control of the Strait or a military stalemate through repeated strikes, with no clear path to an end of the war.
Overall, the administration faces limited options as it navigates the conflict’s continuation, the unlikelihood of U.S. forces depleting munitions, and the risk posed to allies and the international energy market.